St Bruno the Carthusian (cir. 1030-Oct. 6, 1101) was the founder of the Carthusian Order. For more on him consult the Carthusian website. The following was translated using Gemini; Claude provided the editing and ChatGPT was used to identify scripture passages alluded to and also to suggest cross-references. The Catechetical Essay at the end of the commentary was prompted using ChatGPT. Scripture links are to the NABRE.
It must be noted why the first Psalm lacks a title, when the others seem to have titles. It is precisely because it is considered the title of all the other Psalms. For since the intention in this Psalm is the praise of Christ, it implies that in all the others it will treat of Him in manifold ways (cf. Luke 24:27, 44; John 5:39; Hebrews 10:7).
The intention of this Psalm is to remove from Christ those three deaths by which the first man descended to death, and, on the contrary, to praise Him for the triple obedience that the first man lacked (cf. Genesis 2:16–17; Romans 5:12–19; 1 Corinthians 15:21–22; Philippians 2:8). It is the voice of the Prophet considering the damnation of the human race through the disobedience of Adam (cf. Genesis 3:6–19; Romans 7:24) and foreseeing its future reparation through Christ (cf. Isaiah 53:5–6; Romans 5:18; 2 Corinthians 5:19). And this is as if he were to say: “Blessed is the man…” (Psalm 1:1; cf. Matthew 5:3–12).
He says “man” (vir) not in reference to the distinction of sex, but to the maturity and firmness of the senses (cf. 1 Corinthians 16:13; Ephesians 4:13–15). Adam, by delight, consent, operation, and custom of sinning, dying, dragged the whole human race with him, and thus was deservedly unhappy (cf. Genesis 3:6–7; Romans 5:12; James 1:14–15). But there will be one in the future who will be Man (Vir), acting not weakly like Adam, but manfully and maturely (cf. Isaiah 9:6; Jeremiah 23:5; Luke 23:47). And because He will be a Man, He will be blessed, so enriched by God with virtues and works, and afterwards with the blessedness of immortality, that no one has the capacity to reveal it (cf. Isaiah 11:1–5; John 1:14; 1 Peter 1:12; Revelation 1:18).
And from this He will be proven to be blessed, namely, because He is He “who has not walked in the counsel of the ungodly” (Psalm 1:1), that is, He did not depart from the Lord so as to be placed in the delight and consent of sinning through which Adam and Eve descended into death (cf. Genesis 3:1–6; Matthew 4:1–11; Hebrews 4:15). And rightly does he say “counsel,” for before they acted, they received the counsel of sinning and had delight in that counsel (cf. 2 Samuel 17:14; Proverbs 1:10–19). He calls them “ungodly” (impii), not as ignorant of God, but as apostates while retaining knowledge of God (cf. Romans 1:21–23; Titus 1:16; Jude 4).
“Nor stood in the way of sinners” (Psalm 1:1), that is, He did not stand in evil operation in which Adam and Eve stood when they ate against the divine command (cf. Genesis 3:6; John 8:34; Romans 6:16).
“Nor sat in the chair of pestilence” (Psalm 1:1), that is, He did not remain in the custom of sinning as Adam and Eve effectively “taught” sin to their posterity by their example (cf. Romans 5:12–14; Wisdom 2:23–24). For pestilence signifies the widespread corruption of death (cf. Exodus 9:3; Jeremiah 21:6).
It must be noted that he says to walk in delight, to stand in operation, to sit in custom (cf. Jeremiah 44:23; Ephesians 2:1–3). For one first walks toward sin by consent, stands by committing it, and sits by remaining in it (cf. Proverbs 4:14–19; John 8:34). Thus our first parents first “walked away” by delight, “stood” in the act, and “sat” in the habit, and by example led others to death (cf. Romans 5:19; 1 Corinthians 15:22). And operation is rightly called a “way” (via), for it becomes a manifested path (cf. Matthew 7:13–14; Proverbs 2:13–15).
By denying these three things of Christ, the Psalm insinuates the three contrary perfections in Him which Adam lacked. Instead, “His delight is in the law of the Lord, and on His law He meditates day and night” (Psalm 1:2; cf. John 4:34; John 8:29; Hebrews 10:5–7). He delights in fulfilling the will of God just as Adam delighted in transgression (cf. Genesis 3:6; John 15:10). He fulfills the law not intermittently, but continually (cf. John 17:4; Psalm 40:8). And rightly it is said that He “meditates,” since His obedience proceeds with perfect discernment and constancy (cf. Isaiah 50:4–5; Luke 2:49).
And because He thus delights in the law, “He shall be like a tree planted near running waters” (Psalm 1:3), that is, the true Tree of Life (cf. Revelation 2:7; 22:2; Proverbs 3:18), prefigured by the Tree of Life in Paradise (cf. Genesis 2:9; 3:22–24). “Planted beside the streams of waters” signifies His conception by the Holy Spirit in the Virgin (cf. Luke 1:35; Isaiah 7:14; Matthew 1:20–23), and also His presence among the nations, who are likened to waters (cf. Isaiah 17:12–13; Revelation 17:15). Thus His obedience unto death and true humanity are affirmed (cf. Philippians 2:6–8; Hebrews 2:14–17).
“That brings forth its fruit in its season” (Psalm 1:3), not immediately at birth, but at the appointed hour of His Passion, when the fruit of redemption is borne for the world (cf. John 12:23–24; Romans 3:24–26; Galatians 4:4–5).
“His leaf shall not fall” (Psalm 1:3), that is, His word shall not perish (cf. Isaiah 40:8; Matthew 24:35; 1 Peter 1:25). The word is rightly called a leaf, for it adorns the Church and conceals within it the fruit of eternal life (cf. Colossians 1:25–27; John 6:68).
Because He draws life from the abundance of the Spirit, He does not lack power to beget spiritual sons in the time of fulfillment (cf. Isaiah 61:1–3; John 15:5; Romans 8:29–30).
“And all whatsoever He shall do shall prosper” (Psalm 1:3), for all the works of Christ tend to the salvation of believers (cf. John 17:2; Romans 8:28; Ephesians 1:7–10).
“Not so the ungodly” (Psalm 1:4). By aposiopesis the Psalm implies that the righteous shall be conformed to Christ (cf. Romans 8:29; 1 John 3:2), while the ungodly shall not. “Be holy, for I am holy” (Leviticus 11:44; cf. 1 Peter 1:15–16). And as the Apostle says, “As is the earthly, such also are the earthly; and as is the heavenly, such also are the heavenly” (1 Corinthians 15:48).
“They shall be like the dust which the wind driveth from the face of the earth” (Psalm 1:4), that is, barren of doctrine and separated by the Devil from Christ (cf. Matthew 13:19; John 8:44; 2 Corinthians 4:4). Therefore,
“The ungodly shall not rise again in judgment” (Psalm 1:5), meaning they shall not rise so as to be justified (cf. John 5:28–29; Daniel 12:2; Romans 2:12).
Some rise to judge, as the saints (cf. Matthew 19:28; 1 Corinthians 6:2–3); others rise to be judged, some unto salvation (cf. Matthew 25:34), others unto damnation (cf. Matthew 25:41; Revelation 20:11–15).
“Nor sinners in the council of the just” (Psalm 1:5), lest anyone imagine salvation by faith without works (cf. James 2:17, 24; Matthew 7:21–23). Though they rise, they shall not remain among the righteous (cf. Matthew 13:41–43).
Alternatively, the ungodly are those who remain in unbelief and do not judge themselves (cf. 1 Corinthians 11:31–32; John 3:18–20), while sinners are those who refuse to conform their wills to God and remain outside the counsel of the just (cf. Psalm 26:4–5; Romans 8:7).
“For the Lord knoweth the way of the just” (Psalm 1:6), that is, He knows them in love and approbation (cf. John 10:14; Nahum 1:7; 2 Timothy 2:19).
“But the way of the ungodly shall perish” (Psalm 1:6), that is, their manner of life shall lead to destruction because it is not known, that is, not loved, by God (cf. Matthew 7:13; Proverbs 14:12; Matthew 25:12; Luke 13:27).
Or again: the sinners shall not be in the counsel of the just because the life of the just is pleasing to God, but the life of the ungodly displeases Him (cf. Proverbs 15:9; Hebrews 11:6; John 3:36).
ST BRUNO'S COMMENTARY AND THE CATECHISM
St. Bruno’s Christological reading of Psalm 1 stands in profound harmony with the Church’s doctrine on original sin, redemptive obedience, grace, judgment, and conformity to Christ, and in many respects functions as a patristic anticipation of what the modern Catechism formulates with doctrinal precision.
From the very outset, when St. Bruno interprets the first Psalm as the “title” of all the Psalms and as fundamentally ordered toward Christ, he is already articulating what the Church formally teaches concerning the unity of Sacred Scripture in Christ. The Catechism affirms that “the Old Testament is an indispensable part of Sacred Scripture” whose events and institutions “were divinely prepared to announce the coming of Christ” (CCC 121–123). His assertion that all the Psalms speak “in manifold ways” of Christ directly corresponds with the Church’s doctrine of the Christological sense of Scripture, later confirmed by the Second Vatican Council in Dei Verbum, which teaches that “the New Testament lies hidden in the Old and the Old is made manifest in the New” (DV §16; CCC 129–130).
When Bruno frames the entire Psalm around the contrast between the threefold death introduced by Adam and the threefold obedience of Christ, he is operating squarely within what the Catechism calls the doctrine of original sin and recapitulation. The fall of Adam, described by Bruno in terms of delight, consent, operation, and habit, corresponds to the Church’s teaching that original sin is not merely personal fault but a fallen state transmitted to all (CCC 396–404). His insistence that Adam’s sin brought universal death mirrors the dogma that “by one man’s disobedience many were made sinners” (Romans 5:19), which the Catechism explicitly invokes to explain humanity’s need for redemption (CCC 402).
Conversely, Bruno’s portrayal of Christ as the Vir perfectus, the mature and steadfast Man who reverses Adam’s failure through perfect fidelity, directly reflects the Catechism’s doctrine of Christ as the New Adam. “Jesus is the New Adam who remained faithful just where the first Adam had given in to temptation” (CCC 411). The triple negation—Christ does not walk in sinful counsel, does not stand in sinful operation, does not sit in sinful custom—expresses in spiritual terms what the Catechism teaches doctrinally: that Christ’s entire human life is redemptive obedience (CCC 517, 606–608). This obedience climaxes in the Cross, where “by his loving obedience unto death, Jesus fulfills the mission of the suffering Servant” (CCC 623), precisely the “fruit in due season” that Bruno describes as borne at the hour of the Passion.
Bruno’s emphasis on Christ’s delight in the law of the Lord aligns deeply with the Church’s teaching on Christ as both Lawgiver and perfect observer of the Law. The Catechism affirms that Jesus did not abolish the Law but fulfilled it perfectly in interior obedience and love (CCC 577–582, 1965–1970). Bruno’s insistence that Christ “meditates day and night” on the Law anticipates the doctrine that the New Law is primarily the grace of the Holy Spirit poured into the heart, rather than merely an external command (CCC 1966). In Christ, delight in the Law is no longer coerced but interiorized through love.
When Bruno identifies Christ as the true Tree of Life, planted beside the streams of water through the Virgin and the Holy Spirit, he is touching the very center of sacramental and incarnational theology. The Catechism presents Christ as the definitive restoration of what was lost in Eden: “The tree of life, planted in the midst of the garden, prefigures the Cross” (CCC 372, 618). His conception “beside the streams of water” clearly resonates with the Church’s Marian doctrine: the Virgin conceives by the power of the Holy Spirit alone (CCC 484–486), and Christ enters human mortality without sin (CCC 499, 602). At the same time, Bruno’s reading of the “streams” as the peoples among whom Christ is planted corresponds beautifully with the doctrine of the universal mission of the Incarnation, whereby Christ truly assumes human nature in order to redeem all nations (CCC 516, 543, 849).
Bruno’s assertion that Christ bears fruit “in His time”—namely at His Passion—harmonizes with the Church’s theology of the Hour of Jesus, in which salvation is finally accomplished (CCC 607, 2749). The fruit of the Tree is none other than the grace of redemption itself, which the Catechism explains as the objective justification wrought once for all by Christ (CCC 1992), and subjectively applied to believers through faith and the sacraments (CCC 1993–2000). His remark that Christ’s “leaf,” that is, His word, never falls away aligns with the Church’s doctrine on the permanence and authority of the Word of God (CCC 81–83, 104).
Bruno’s transition from Christ to the conformity of the righteous to Christ (“the pious shall be as Christ”) reflects the Catechism’s doctrine of divinization and sanctification. The Church teaches that believers are not merely forgiven but made truly righteous through participation in divine life (CCC 1987–1995, 460). The saints become “other Christs” by grace, sharing analogically in His holiness without equaling it. Thus Bruno’s interpretation of “the way of the just” as a participation in Christ’s own life directly embodies the Church’s teaching on the universal call to holiness (CCC 2012–2014; Lumen Gentium §39–42).
When Bruno describes the ungodly as dust driven by the wind, separated from the face of the earth, his language aligns with the Catechism’s solemn teaching on moral responsibility, spiritual blindness, and final judgment. The Catechism teaches that those who persist in grave sin freely exclude themselves from communion with God (CCC 1033–1037). His notion that the ungodly “do not rise in judgment” not as a denial of resurrection, but as denial of justification, reflects the Church’s careful distinction between the general resurrection of all and the particular outcome of judgment (CCC 988–1001, 1021–1022). All rise, but not all rise unto life.
Bruno’s clarification that some rise to judge, others to be judged, resonates directly with the Catechism’s doctrine concerning the communion of saints and participation in Christ’s judgment: “The righteous will reign with Christ forever” and “will judge the world” in Him (CCC 1042–1045, . 677). His careful exclusion of sinners from “the council of the just” also directly reflects the Church’s rejection of salvation by faith alone without works: “Faith without works is dead” (CCC 1814–1816), and final judgment will be according to deeds done in the body (CCC 1038–1041).
Finally, Bruno’s concluding line—“The Lord knoweth the way of the just, and the way of the ungodly shall perish”—is in full accord with the Catechism’s profound teaching on divine knowledge as covenantal love. In Scripture and doctrine alike, to be “known” by God is not mere intellectual awareness but loving election and communion (CCC 1, 257, 2712). To be “unknown” is to be outside that covenantal love by one’s own free refusal (CCC 679, 1861). The “perishing of the way” of the ungodly expresses the Church’s sober doctrine that moral evil is self-destructive because it contradicts the very order of truth and life established by God (CCC 1955, 1958, 1868–1869).
When read in light of the Catechism and the Church’s major doctrinal syntheses—from Dei Verbum on revelation, to Lumen Gentium on holiness, to the dogmatic teaching on grace, justification, and judgment—St. Bruno’s exposition of Psalm 1 emerges not simply as a medieval allegory, but as a remarkably complete proto-dogmatic catechesis on Christ, sin, grace, sanctification, and eschatological destiny, entirely consonant with the living teaching office of the Church.
Continue.
Comments
Post a Comment