Father Noel Alexandre's Literal Commentary on 1 Peter 1:3-9

 Translated by Qwen. 1 Pet 1:3–4: The Blessing of Regeneration "Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who according to His great mercy has regenerated us unto a living hope, through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead, unto an inheritance incorruptible, undefiled, and unfading, reserved in heaven for you." We ought to give immortal thanks to God, to offer Him continually the sacrifice of praise, on account of His infinite goodness toward His elect. It belongs to the Eternal Father to choose the members of His Son, the adopted children who are co-heirs with the Only-Begotten. Let us seek no other reason for this election than mercy, whose greatness cannot be worthily expressed in human words. He who spared not His own Son, but delivered Him up for us all. Us, unworthy sinners, His enemies, deserving of eternal punishments, He has regenerated through Baptism; and, the oldness which we had contracted from Adam in our first birth being abolished, He ...

Commentary on Daniel 5:1–2, 5–9, 13–17, 25–6:1

 

Daniel 5:1–2, 5–9, 13–17, 25–6:1 presents one of the most memorable and symbolically rich narratives in the entire book: the story of Belshazzar’s Feast and the divine writing on the wall. This episode reveals the theme of divine sovereignty over human pride, the continuity of prophetic wisdom through Daniel, and the immediate judgment of God upon impious rulers.


Context and Setting

Daniel 5 occurs near the end of the Babylonian empire, years after the reign of Nebuchadnezzar. The king in this scene, Belshazzar, is described as “the son of Nebuchadnezzar” (Dan 5:2), which in Semitic idiom can mean descendant or successor. Historically, Belshazzar was the son of Nabonidus, the last actual king of Babylon, who had left his son as co-regent during his absence. This fits perfectly with the narrative detail that Belshazzar could only offer Daniel the title of third ruler in the kingdom (Dn 5:29)—since the first was Nabonidus, the second Belshazzar himself, and Daniel could only be made third.

The scene thus unfolds during Babylon’s final night (cf. Dan 5:30–31), when the empire’s pride and impiety reach their climax.


Dan 5:1-2: Profanation of the Sacred

“King Belshazzar made a great feast for a thousand of his lords, and drank wine in the presence of the thousand. Belshazzar, when he tasted the wine, commanded that the golden and silver vessels which Nebuchadnezzar his father had taken from the temple in Jerusalem be brought, that the king, his nobles, his wives, and his concubines might drink from them.” (CPDV)

This opening scene immediately sets a tone of blasphemous arrogance. The feast of a thousand nobles symbolizes Babylon’s worldly glory and decadence, while the use of the sacred vessels from the Jerusalem Temple signifies direct defiance of the God of Israel.

In biblical theology, to misuse what has been consecrated (qadosh, “holy”) is to commit sacrilege (cf. Lev 10:1–2; 2 Sam 6:6–7). Here, Belshazzar’s act recalls Nebuchadnezzar’s earlier pride (Dan 4), but with a crucial difference: Nebuchadnezzar ultimately repented and acknowledged God’s sovereignty; Belshazzar mocks the divine outright. The Babylonian king elevates himself in drunken hubris above the sacred, and this will precipitate his immediate downfall.


Dan 5:5–9: The Handwriting on the Wall

“In that same hour, the fingers of a man’s hand appeared and wrote, opposite the lampstand, on the plaster of the wall of the king’s palace… Then the king’s face was changed, and his thoughts troubled him.”

The sudden appearance of a disembodied hand writing on the wall is one of the most dramatic theophanies in Scripture. It represents the direct and visible intrusion of divine judgment into human history. In the ancient Near East, divine writing was the symbol of fate or decree; here, Yahweh Himself writes Belshazzar’s doom.

The “lampstand” emphasizes that this message is written in the very light of Babylon’s own festivities—it cannot be hidden. The change in Belshazzar’s countenance and the trembling of his knees (v. 6) form a striking contrast to his earlier arrogance. As in Pharaoh’s court (cf. Gen 41:8), the “wise men” of Babylon—magicians, Chaldeans, and diviners—are summoned but fail to interpret the writing, emphasizing the impotence of pagan wisdom before the revelation of the true God. The same motif runs throughout Daniel (cf. Dn 2:2–11; Dn 4:7–9): human knowledge, however refined, cannot comprehend divine mysteries unless God grants the interpretation.


Dan 5:13–17: Daniel Summoned

“Then Daniel was brought in before the king… ‘Are you Daniel, one of the exiles of Judah, whom the king my father brought from Judah?’”

Belshazzar’s words betray his ignorance and contempt: he knows Daniel only as an exiled captive, not as a prophet or servant of the Most High. This deliberate diminishment reveals the king’s spiritual blindness.

Daniel, however, stands before him in calm detachment. The contrast could not be sharper: the king, surrounded by luxury and fear, versus the aged prophet, poor and serene. Belshazzar promises him wealth, purple garments, a gold chain, and high office, but Daniel refuses: “Let your gifts be for yourself, and give your rewards to another; nevertheless I will read the writing to the king.” (v. 17)

This refusal is more than humility—it is a prophetic gesture of moral independence. Daniel serves no earthly master; his wisdom is not for sale. In the tradition of the prophets (cf. 2 Kgs 5:16; Mic 3:11), the truth of God’s word cannot be bought or flattered.


Dan 5:25–28: The Interpretation — Mene, Tekel, Peres

“This is the writing that was inscribed: Mene, Mene, Tekel, and Peres. This is the interpretation of the matter: Mene, God has numbered your kingdom and finished it; Tekel, you have been weighed in the balances and found wanting; Peres, your kingdom is divided and given to the Medes and Persians.”

These mysterious Aramaic words are financial weights: mene (mina), tekel (shekel), and peres (half-mina or division). Their wordplay conveys three judgments:

  1. Mene (from manā, “to count”): God has numbered Belshazzar’s days. His time is up.

  2. Tekel (from taqal, “to weigh”): He has been weighed on the divine scales and found deficient, recalling the moral imagery of justice (cf. Job 31:6; Ps 62:9).

  3. Peres (from paras, “to divide” or “Persia”): The kingdom will be divided, and given to the Medes and Persians.

The repetition of mene intensifies finality—there is no appeal, no delay. The very wordplay between Peres (divided) and Paras (Persia) is a linguistic sign of the transition of power: God’s sovereignty determines history, transferring empires at will (cf. Dan 2:21).


Dan 5:29-6:1: The Fall of Babylon

“That very night Belshazzar the Chaldean king was slain. And Darius the Mede received the kingdom.”

The narrative closes with abrupt swiftness. There is no dramatic battle scene; the judgment comes quietly and inevitably “that very night.” Herodotus and Xenophon both recount that the Persian army entered Babylon during a festival, diverting the Euphrates River and capturing the city almost without resistance—just as the biblical account implies.

Thus, the story’s theological emphasis is not on military might but on the immediacy of divine justice. In one night the golden empire of Babylon falls, fulfilling Daniel’s earlier interpretation of Nebuchadnezzar’s dream (Dan 2:37–39). The sequence of empires—the head of gold, the chest of silver—begins to unfold, and the sovereignty of God stands vindicated.


Theological Reflections

  1. Divine Sovereignty and Human Arrogance — Belshazzar’s feast epitomizes the pride that exalts itself against God and desecrates what is holy. The “writing on the wall” has become proverbial for the inevitability of divine retribution.

  2. The Sanctity of the Sacred — The vessels from the Jerusalem Temple symbolize holiness dedicated to God. Their profanation becomes the immediate cause of judgment, prefiguring later biblical warnings about sacrilege and idolatry (cf. 1 Cor 10:21).

  3. Prophetic Witness — Daniel, now an old man, reappears as the unbending prophet whose wisdom comes not from earthly study but from divine revelation. His independence from reward models the integrity of those who serve God in hostile cultures.

  4. Transition of Empires — The fall of Babylon and rise of the Medes and Persians confirms God’s control over history. As in the Canticle of the Three Youths (Dan 3:52–90), God’s dominion is everlasting, while kingdoms rise and fall at His decree.

  5. Moral and Eschatological Symbolism — “Weighed and found wanting” is not merely a verdict upon Belshazzar but upon every human life before God’s scales of justice. The scene foreshadows the eschatological judgment of all nations (cf. Matt 25:31–46).


Catechetical Parallels (CCC)

  • CCC 269 – God’s omnipotence “is universal, for he who created everything also governs everything.”

  • CCC 2113 – Idolatry consists not only in false worship but in “divinizing what is not God,” as Belshazzar did when he praised “gods of gold and silver.”

  • CCC 678–682 – The final judgment will reveal each person’s deeds, echoing Daniel’s imagery of divine weighing and accounting.


Conclusion

Daniel 5 dramatizes in a single night the downfall of pride and the triumph of divine justice. The profane feast of Belshazzar becomes the stage on which God Himself writes the verdict of history. Daniel, standing serene amid revelers and kings, embodies the eternal wisdom that endures when empires vanish.

The “handwriting on the wall” thus remains not merely a record of Babylon’s fall, but a timeless warning: that every kingdom, every soul, must one day be weighed in the balance of the living God.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

St Jerome's Commentary on Isaiah 8:23-9:3 (9:1-4)

Father Joseph Knabenbauer's Commentary on Zephaniah 2:3; 3:12-13

St Bruno's Commentary on Matthew 4:12-23